Jurisdictional Discovery Awarded with Respect to Multi-Tier
Limited Partnership
In a recent decision from Minnesota,
jurisdictional discovery with respect to the citizenship of a defendant limited
partnership was awarded. Tim-Menn, Inc.
v. Tim Horton’s USA, Inc., Case No. 19-CV-409 (JNE/ECW), 2019 WL 2865600
(D. Minn. July 3, 2019).
The plaintiff in this action, Tim-Menn, is a
franchisee and area developer for Tim Horton’s Restaurants in Minnesota. Tim
Horton USA, Inc. (“THUSA”) is the franchisor for the US-based franchises of Tim
Horton’s. Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership (“RBI”) is
apparently the parent of THUSA. What is the nature of any claims Tim-Menn might
have against RBI, the apparent shareholder of THUSA, is not detailed in this
decision.
At this juncture, the court had twice directed
the plaintiff to file information with respect to the citizenship of RBI. Having,
based upon the publicly available information, been unable to identify who are
the partners in RBI, and in that one of those partners was in turn a Brazilian/USA
investment firm with offices in Rio de Janeiro and New York City, the plaintiff
requested a stay and jurisdictional discovery so as to ascertain the
citizenship of RBI. That motion was resisted by the defendants, largely on
grounds of futility. Finding that the plaintiffs had “exhausted all publicly
available avenues to determine the identity of RBI’s partners and their
citizenship,” setting aside arguments on whether a valid claim had been made
until such time as they are presented on a motion to dismiss, discovery as to
RBI’s citizenship was allowed.
The opinion has an undercurrent of criticism of
defense counsel, it being suggested that if they would come forward with
information showing that the limited partnership has a Minnesota citizen, it
would be clear that diversity did not exist and the matter would be dismissed.
While the award of jurisdictional discovery
after the plaintiff had made a complete investigation of the publicly available
information bears similarities to the analysis undertaken in Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. AEI Life,
LLC, 2015 WL 5131423 (3rd Cir Sept. 2, 2015), that decision was
not cited in this opinion. HERE IS A LINK to my review of the Lincoln Benefit Life decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment