Deed
from LLC Void Where There Was No Actual or
Apparent Agency Authority to Sign It on LLC’s Behalf
Apparent Agency Authority to Sign It on LLC’s Behalf
In a decision from Indiana, it was held that a deed of
property from an LLC was void where the person who executed it on behalf of the
LLC had neither apparent nor actual authority to do so. On the facts of this
case, the subsequent transferees of the real property were held to not have
valid title thereto. GO Properties, LLC v.
BER Enterprises, LLC, 112 N.E.3d 200 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018).
GO Properties, LLC had two members, Olicorp Properties, LLC
and Gracie Properties, LLC. Olicorp’s sole member was Larry Oliver while Gracie
Properties’ sole member was Stacy Phillips. As described by the court, Phillips
“went rogue,” holding herself out as having authority to act on behalf of GO Properties.
This she did withstanding the fact that Olicorp was designated as the “Member
Manager” of GO Properties with the sole authority “to sign agreements and other
instruments on behalf of [the] Company.” The court noted as well that “Neither
Oliver nor Phillips was authorized, as an individual, to do any business on
behalf of GO Properties.”
Notwithstanding these limitations on her authority, Phillips
purported to sell certain real property owned by GO Properties. For that
purpose, she hired Best Title Services to examine the title and provide closing
services. Best Title failed to identify a mortgage that GO Properties had
granted to Maxim Alliance Group. Further, “Best Title relied on Phillips' representation
that she was the owner of GO Properties and as it conducted to examination and
later acted as closing agent for the transaction.” After the closing, the
purchaser flipped the purchased properties.
Some 20 months later, GO Properties filed a complaint
seeking to quiet title in the transferred properties in itself; BER Enterprises,
the named defendant, was a subsequent purchaser of one of the parcels of real
estate. While the trial court would grant summary judgment in favor of the
purchasers, the Court of Appeals reversed.
Reviewing the law of the apparent agency and its requirement
that the principal have made a manifestation to the third-party that would
instill a reasonable belief that Phillips had authority to act on behalf of GO Properties,
such a communication was found to be lacking. Rather:
Here, GO Properties made absolutely no direct or indirect
statements indicating that Phillips had authority to act on its behalf. The
Operating Agreement clearly states that Olicorp was the sole Member Manager.
Neither Oliver and Phillips as individuals nor Gracie Properties as an entity
was authorized to act on behalf of GO Properties.
Addressing the due diligence that should have been
undertaken, in opposition to Phillips’ bare representation that she was an
owner, the court observed:
At the trial court’s request, GO Properties
provided examples of underwriting standards for title insurance. Among other
things, to insure title from an LLC, it is necessary to obtain a copy of the
LLC’s operating agreement, any and all amendments thereto, and a certificate
that the operating agreement is a true and correct copy of the agreement in
effect at the time of the sale. This practice is wise because it protects both
the other members of the LLC and all future purchasers of the property.
Had this practice been observed in this case, neither the original nor
subsequent transactions would have occurred.
In sum, Phillips did not
have actual or apparent authority to sell the Properties on behalf of GO
Properties. As a result, the original sale of the Properties to Elden
Investments was void. Because
the deed that Phillips executed on behalf of GO Properties was void, all future
conveyances of the Properties were likewise void. Therefore, the trial court
erred by entering summary judgment in favor of BER Enterprises and New Field
and by denying GO Properties’ summary judgment motion.
112 N.E.3d at 204 (footnotes
and record citation omitted, emphasis
in original).
No comments:
Post a Comment