An opinion from the Advisory Opinion Unit of the Office of Counsel, New York State
Department of Taxation
and Finance dated May 29,
2015, addressed
the treatment of property held through a single-member LLC for New York State estate
tax purposes. It would ultimately
determine that
property held
in a single-member LLC
would be treated as directly owned by the single-member.
This opinion was
issued in the context of an individual who planned to contribute his condominium, located in New York, to an LLC, and to then move to another jurisdiction. Although not expressly recited
in the opinion, it is presumed that the question involved whether, upon the death of the single-member, the condominium
itself or the interest in the LLC would be treated as in the decedent’s estate.
While a condominium
is treated as real property and subject to the New York State estate tax, where the real property is held by a corporation, partnership or trust, the decedent’s estate is treated as holding an intangible interest in the business organization. Further, New York law prohibits the imposition of an estate tax on the intangible property of a person not resident in New York, even if that intangible property
is located in New York.
All that said, in reliance upon the “Check the Box” regulations providing, inter
alia, that
absent election
to treat a single-member
LLC as a corporation, it will be “disregarded, its activities [] treated in the same manner as a sole proprietorship, branch, or division of the owner.” 26 C.F.R. § 301.7701-2(a), the opinion concludes
that:
Under the circumstances presented
by the Petitioner, interest in the SMLLC owned by Petitioner
would not be treated for estate tax purposes as an intangible asset. Instead, the condominium
held by the SMLLC would be treated as real property held by the Petitioner for
New York State estate tax purposes.
This determination is troubling in a number of respects. First, the treatment of a SMLLC as a “disregarded entity” under the Check the Box regulations
relates to
income tax classification.
It was never intended
to address estate planning
questions.
Second, this opinion conflicts
with the numerous statutes and decisions which have held, inter alia, that
notwithstanding disregarded entity tax classification, a SMLLC has a real
existence, and the sole member and the LLC are not to be treated as one. This is a topic I covered in Regarding
the Disregarded Entity, 14
J. Passthrough Entities 39
(March/April 2011). HERE IS A LINK to
that article.
Third, notably absent
from the discussion was
any reference
to New York LLC Act. Specifically, it provides:
A membership interest
in the limited liability
company is personal property. A member has no interest in specific property of the liability company.
No comments:
Post a Comment