No Valuation
Distinction Between a Mere Assignee and a Limited Partner
In a recent decision from the
Tax Court, it was held that an assignee and a limited partner would have the
same valuation discounts. Estate of
Streightoff v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2018-178 (October 24, 2018).
The Tax Court was called upon
to determine whether a donor had transferred the entirety of a limited
partnership interest, or merely an assignee right therein. The court held, in
this instance, that the donor had transferred the limited partnership interest,
and not a mere assignee interest. The court went on to hold that, however, the
distinction did not matter, and that the discount applied would be the same
irrespective of whether a limited partnership interest or a mere assignee
interest were conveyed. Both had the same right to distributions. While a limited
partnership interest did convey a right to vote, that right existed only with
respect to the removal of the general partner (thereby effectuating the
partnership’s termination), and the limited partners had, to date, never held a
vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment