Agency and Choice
of Law
In a decision rendered in
Delaware earlier this year, there was considered the question of which law
would control whether the purported agent of an LLC had actual authority to
bind the company. CompoSecure, L.L.C. v.
Cardux, LLC f/k/a Affluent Card LLC, C.A. No. 12524-VCL (Del. Ch. Feb. 1,
2018 as corrected Feb. 12, 2018).
In this dispute, Vice
Chancellor Laster was, amongst many other issues, called upon to determine
whether New Jersey or Delaware law would apply. At issue was whether a
Marketing Agreement was validly entered into. That agreement provided that it
would be governed by New Jersey law. However, that agreement had been entered
into by a Delaware organized LLC. As such, the question was whether New Jersey
or Delaware law would apply.
Vice Chancellor Laster
determined that Delaware law would control on the basis that the existence or
not of actual authority to execute the agreement on behalf of the Delaware LLC
was governed, pursuant to the internal affairs doctrine, by Delaware law.
No comments:
Post a Comment