Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Controlling Law For Standing to Bring a Derivative Action

The Law of the Jurisdiction of Incorporation Governs the
Ability to Bring a Derivative Action
      The Delaware Chancery Court recently addressed the law governing the ability to bring a derivative action.  Microsoft Corp v. Vadem, Ltd., No. 6940-VCP (Del. Ch. Apr. 27, 2012). 
      Vadem, Ltd. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands.  Microsoft is a shareholder in Vadem.  On Vadem’s behalf, Microsoft sought to bring a derivative action, which action was filed in the Delaware Chancery Court.  The Court looked to the law of the British Virgin Islands to determine whether Microsoft had standing to bring a derivative claim on Vadem’s behalf.  Under the law of the British Virgin Islands, the bringing of a derivative action requires the consent of the High Court of the British Virgin Islands.  No such consent had been received.  On that basis, the derivative action was dismissed.
      Kentucky has a non-uniform statutory provision that dictates this same result.  KRS § 271B.7-400(6) provides that:
In any derivative proceedings in the right of a foreign corporation, the matters covered by this section shall be governed by the laws of the jurisdiction of incorporation.
A plaintiff seeking, on behalf of a corporation organized in a particular jurisdiction, must be familiar with and in a position to satisfy all of the requirements imposed by the laws of that jurisdiction.  Where those requirements are not satisfied, the suit should be summarily dismissed by the court.

No comments:

Post a Comment