Hong Kong Limited Company is a “Corporation” for Diversity
Jurisdiction Purposes
In a recent decision from the US Court of
Appeals for the 8th Circuit, it adopted the reasoning employed by
the 7th Circuit and held that a Hong Kong Limited Company would be,
for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, treated as a corporation. Jet Midwest International Co. Ltd v. Jet Midwest Group, LLC, No.
18-1311, 2019 WL 354-0060 (8th Cir. August 2, 2019).
For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, none of
the defendants may have the same citizenship as any of the plaintiffs. With
respect to business organizations, there is a significant divide between those
that are corporations and those that are not. If an entity is classified as a
corporation, only its jurisdiction of incorporation and that of its principal
place of business are the citizenships of the entity. Alternatively, if it is
an unincorporated organization then the entity has the citizenship of each of
the members. This classification problem is especially acute with respect to
non-US business entities and the question of whether or not the entity should
be treated as being incorporated or unincorporated.
In this dispute, the question was whether Jet
Midwest International Co., LTD would or would not be treated as a corporation.
This company (“JMI”) is organized as a Hong Kong Limited Company having its
principal place of business in Beijing. The defendant in this action challenged
whether JMI should be classified as a corporation or as an unincorporated
organization.
The 8th Circuit, acknowledging it had
not previously addressed the question, looked to the extensive body of law in
the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that had touched on the question.
Under those decisions a Hong Kong limited company is classified, for purposes
of diversity jurisdiction, as a corporation, and in this case that rule was
followed.
No comments:
Post a Comment